-
Website
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/ -
Original page
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/wtf-show-me-the-mammaries.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mychaleg
85 comments · 2 points
-
Peter Donohue
123 comments · 83 points
-
littlemovieman
58 comments · 2 points
-
Rohith
48 comments · 1 points
-
Reebee7
114 comments · 58 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Caption This: Win Uwe Boll’s Far Cry on DVD!
17 hours ago · 12 comments
-
New Moon Topples The Dark Knight’s Opening Day Record
18 hours ago · 12 comments
-
Here’s Your Chance: What Did You Think of Twilight: New Moon?
2 days ago · 23 comments
-
Review: The Twilight Saga: New Moon
1 day ago · 10 comments
-
Remember Me Trailer: Maybe Robert Pattinson Can Act
2 days ago · 16 comments
-
Caption This: Win Uwe Boll’s Far Cry on DVD!
this article is probably supposed to be in good humor, but quite frankly, you're not funny. People like you are the reason that many people don't take actresses seriously, while male actors are well-respected and revered.
Fuck off.
you either start off as a serious actress or at least, no nudity, and continue in that trend or you show some skin for as long as you can :p
p.s. who says guys dont do nude? ever seen some judd apatow movies?
What's wrong with nudity when the part calls for it? Frankly, I think it's rediculous when an actress in a film just has mind-blowing sex with a guy but bundles up in the bed sheets (a la Vicky Cristina Barcelona) or has a scene where she literally flashes her breasts, but its awkwardly shot off screen (a la Bottle Shock).
That, to me, is disgusting.
But the fact of the matter is, tit's sell, dicks don't (Tom Cruise not-withstanding) if Hollywood was fair it wouldn't be the industry it is now.
By the way, Marisa Tomei looked great in The Wrestler! I'd also say she did in Before The Devil Knows Your Dead, but that also forced us to see more of Phillip Seymour Hoffman than necessary.
Was this meant to be humorous? And I am asking that in sincerity, not as some sarcastic remark. A bit of clarity on the article might offer insight into how I should read it.
I just like boobies, dude.
I don't remember Julia Roberts being topless in "Pretty Woman" but maybe. IN the bathtub did a nipple pop out or something?
I'm surprised about Olga because she went nude for Maxim Ukraine when Bond came out. Here's the gorgeous shots
http://egotastic.com/entertainment/celebrities/ol...
I think I died a bit inside.
At least those pics of Olga helped me feel better.
I get what Carr is saying though. Don't think of it in terms of nudity. Think of it in terms of "This is what made them famous" and now they're too good for it. It'd be like if Jamie Lee Curtis had a clause in her contract that said "no screaming." Some of these girls can't act all that well and got most of their work by being beautiful. It's kind of rude to the fans to say "Well, you made me millions by liking to look at me, now keep giving me money while I don't give you what you want."
I can see why some people would think that's sexist or derogatory, but there is a point here. Another example would be if someone from FSR ended up writing for like, The New Yorker and then refused to ever write an article for the web again that used the word fuck and boobies.
"I’m not asking everyone to be like Kate Winslet or Anne Heche who show their tits in everything from R-rated movies to cross-over commercials for The Backyardigans."
Well done.
I think it all depends on the roles and how the nudity has context within the story. There is a big difference between Kate Winslet in Titanic and the who ever they were girls from American Pie 2.
And unfortunately, there has been a rather big influx of male nudity in movies these days and they even sneak attack the viewers at times (I am looking at you "Forgetting Sarah Marshall"). It all comes down to female bodies are usually easier on the eyes then their male counterparts.