DISQUS

Film School Rejects: Wolverine Scores Lame-Ass Drugs–And the Movie Might Be In Trouble

  • Robert Fure · 1 year ago
    Ephedra just made me light headed. What you need to do is take a stimulant and rock it back with a redbull and V until your head explodes - wait a second where I am and where are my pants?

    Oh I'm at work. Why are people yelling? Oh my pants. I'm going to stop typing now.
  • SUPERJUNK · 1 year ago
    Wait so whats the problem with the movie???
  • Sometimesnude · 1 year ago
    this is the absolute worst article i have ever read on FSR. no point, tons of ramblings.... how did this past by the editor? lol
  • Meep · 1 year ago
    I agree with sometimes nude.

    Okay um..yeah, what IS wrong with the movie? I saw the trailer at comic-con, it looked awesome to me?
  • SUPERJUNK · 1 year ago
    So is the problem with wolverine that you dont think it will be better than Iron Man? I must be missing something........
  • random-man lives · 1 year ago
    Does just any old crap appear on this website now?
  • Mister Hand · 1 year ago
    Wow. Apparently I wrote the worst article ever.

    Re-reading, I can't really disagree. Sorry. Wolverine is a very personal subject. I went off on a rant. There's a link referenced above. Click on Hollywood Elsewhere and that will explain the "problem" with the movie.

    I will do better in the future.

    And, on a sidenote: with the way you people treat me, is it any wonder all I can think is, "Kill, kill, kill?"
  • JMoney · 1 year ago
    Seriously, are you hacking the site and posting your own articles or something? this is the second of two very shitty stories, how/why did you get hired?
  • JMoney · 1 year ago
    after clicking a link to more of your articles, it seems you've written for this blog for awhile, i must have just been lucky and never clicked on any of your articles because when i read your harrison ford tribute story i seriously thought a 15 year old kid wrote that.
  • JMoney · 1 year ago
    i didnt know it was someone who has been writing for FSR for awhile.
  • KMoney · 1 year ago
    JMoney, that's a bit harsh.
  • Bob Funn · 1 year ago
    Why are you writing? Please go join i09 while this place has a chance.
  • Mister Hand · 1 year ago
    Actually, I'm the brother-in-law to one of the higher-ups here at FSR. I was bouncing around life as a professional lemon peeler/taster with an occasional gig on the weekends whipping cream for French pastries. But then FSR found me and I've been living it up in Beverly Hills ever since. From time to time I have to turn in a few successive paragraphs referencing some sort of film news (or, as is the case with this article, NOT referencing film news) to keep the rest of the staff from wondering why I have an executive parking space at the FSR Compound and Homestall.

    Having said that, your comments are well-noted and I will give them EXACTLY the amount of considered regard they deserve.
  • Bob Funn · 1 year ago
    Listen, I get it... you want to be the 'wacky article' guy and theres a place for that. just not as a front page article with a headline that suggests a movie in trouble and with drugs involved, and then I get to read an inane commentary that had nothing to say.

    May I suggest a side article area ala arstechnica.com's tech journels.

    You could even call it 'Wacky non sequitur guy'.
  • Cole Abaius · 1 year ago
    The gantlet is thrown! Worst article? I bet I could write something way worse than this. You're on, Mister Hand. If that is, in fact, your real name. Which I doubt.
  • Cole Abaius · 1 year ago
    Oh, and Bob Funn - kudos on spelling 'non sequitur' correctly. I can't tell you the amount of people that make it 'sequitor,' and spellcheck has no clue what it is. You are officially my hero.
  • Aleric · 1 year ago
    I also will take exception to the comment that this movie will be like the first two X-Men movies..............IMPOSSIBLE. Those two had scant action and paper thin stories with no real Woverine savagery. Hugh Jackman at least seems to be trying to stay true to most of the comic renditions, something neither of the X-Men movies was able to do.
  • Mister Hand · 1 year ago
    No, I think it's the worst. And I'm really not even trying to be funny. I went for a thing. It didn't work. Nobody cares about my biographical information.

    I do take issue with Bob's claim that I'm trying to be "wacky article guy." That's just simply not true. I write what I write. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I only aim to entertain.

    But, Cole, if I have to endure the slings of arrows of Bob and JMoney AND KMoney, then at least be kind enough to allow my "Worst Article Evar" to stand. Let it be a shining testament to the Money Brothers if nothing else. Don't let their hard comment work be for naught.
  • JMoney · 1 year ago
    as i said, i wrote my comments before i realized you were a regular writer, i recognised your name from the comments sections and i seriously thought you'd either hacked the site and posted something, or it was a trial run where they were letting you write a couple stories. its only your last two i've had a problem with, i've obviously read your other stuff and just didn't notice you wrote them because they didn't weren't as mediocre as this one and the Jack Ryan one.
  • Bob Funn · 1 year ago
    @Cole: thanks, unfortunately my spelling of "journels" dissipated any feelings of accomplishment I may have had...

    @Mister Hand: Don't let us naysayers stop you from trying, but hopefully all our whining convinces you to tone it down a little, or at least write better ;)
  • juggz143 · 1 year ago
    I actually had no problems with the artical but I didn't come across it as a Front Page Headline either, tho... Oh Well