-
Website
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/ -
Original page
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/wolverines-origin-becomes-a-pirate-story.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mychaleg
110 comments · 3 points
-
Peter Donohue
155 comments · 92 points
-
littlemovieman
58 comments · 2 points
-
Rohith
63 comments · 1 points
-
Reebee7
134 comments · 85 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Boiling Point: Too Early to Talk Avatar?
1 day ago · 12 comments
-
Arianna Huffington Out’s The Wachowskis’ Next
10 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Michael Bay’s Alternate Vision for Transformers 3
11 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Culture Warrior’s Culturally Significant Films of the Decade
1 day ago · 6 comments
-
Mark Wahlberg Threatens to Make an ‘Entourage’ Movie
2 days ago · 15 comments
-
Boiling Point: Too Early to Talk Avatar?
Do they though? I will await with much interest the fallout of this as I tend to disagree. I mean on a personal note I wasn't that jazzed to see it regardless hence my disinterest in even an early release. But the majority I feel will flock to this but going by what I know about public view of piracy I don't think it will have THAT big an effect on opening weekend numbers. Note I say not THAT big as I feel it will have an effect.
As for the pirated version, I'm not going to say I'm not curious to watch it. This is totally the kind of movie where for me, if I did, uh, pirate it, and it turned out to be good, then I would go see it in the theater. Its an action movie, made to be huge and explody on the big screen. If it's shit, I'd rather watch it at home, turn it off when I'm sick of it, and never feel like I wasted the money seeing it / supporting hollywood's idea that movies like that are good. Regardless of your ethical issues with piracy, the continued success of "shit" movies (*cough* paul blartt *cough* the spirit *cough*) will continue the production of them, even if the critic world slams those movies.
Just look at the Meet The Spartans line of films if you don't see credible evidence for that.
For myself, I have pirate. A lot of what I pirate, I then go and see in theatre or go and buy the dvd. On top of that, a lot of movies I have pirated I had never heard of before (case in point, Ryan Reynolds' The Nines, which I waited patiently to buy the day it came out on dvd). Its a mixed bag, with pros and cons, and to simply say that any real movie lover knows it isn't cool is arrogant, Cole. But I don't really want to get off into a whole piracy rant which I seem to have done.
I may watch this. If it makes me want to kill a small orphanage due to character changes, I won't see it in the theatre. If it's good, I will see it in theatre. That being said, if it's a working print and is missing a ton of effects, then no, I won't let it change my opinion. And of course, this is all assuming that I find the time to download it in the next weeks and actually watch it. So don't demonize me just yet.
I don't think movie piracy is the negative thing the studios make it out to be...Taken was leaked online 6 months before it's U.S. release and still managed to very well...even Slumdog got leaked prior to it's wide release and still is doing great...piracy only hurts a studio if they put out bad films...I really doubt this will effect the blockbusters like Wolverine...since this isn't a finished film I think the people over doing the effects are going to be seeing a lawsuit from 20th Century Fox...
Any person along that line can make a DVD dupe in under 10 minutes. Hell, half of them their job entitles DVD duping. You could make up some studio regulation that only certain people can dupe, but they won't obey it as it is a time handicap. The watermark is a simple layer on the timeline and can be clicked off by anyone on the street, even if they've never seen an edit machine before. It would take them 3 minutes to figure it out. Plus, sometimes plans are scrapped. Copies don't get sent out. If one is left on a desk or thrown away before being shredded, you're in trouble. Considering they say the effects weren't finished yet, the only place a non-watermarked leak would come from is the edit or effects areas. Anything actually made for delivery probably would have a watermark on it. I haven't watched the download, nor will I (a big SFX movie with unfinished SFX? No thanks), but if someone has - was there a slate? The slate would identify the run time, title, and edit. That could pin your leak down a little tighter.
Short of posting a guard outside every edit facility working on the project and doing full searches and barcoding each DVD and confirming delivery, you can't stop it. The cost of hiring people and taking more time to do things would be very cost prohibitive.
As for barcoding the dvd, it would be pointless. the protection would last all of a week before someone cracked it for someone they know blah blah blah, and it would be null and void. It happened with the prerelease cds of a bunch of different bands over the years. Like you said, spending the money on protecting things like that would drive up overall costs, and potentially be detrimental to sales in the long run. The video game industry learned that the hard way.
edit: chud also won't load for me, i'm guessing the heavy traffic from digg's front page is causing that
Bad enough the RIAA/MPAA want to sue people for thousands of times the damage that is actually caused by an offenders actions but now we want to throw somebody in prison for......waitforit.... releasing a movie to the public before it hits the big screens.
I take it you'd also vote YES for the NY Rockefeller laws if you were given a chance.
Insanity.
Horrible!
Crappy script.
Did they not watch the Dark Knight?,to see how to make a movie worth watching?
Lame........
I got tired half way through and it wasn't good enough to keep watching. Managed to get through the rest of it over an early breakfast and all I can say is - "meh".
Not a good film, and not a great origin story at all.
People making these films should go and watch Ironman and Batman Begins and realise that creating a film with substance and intelligence is resonating more with moviegoers than popcorn fluff.
But I will download this movie and watch it because this is a great insight into how a movie becomes a movie, step-by-step. I've always been interested in postproduction steps; what's real, what's been CGI-ed (despite the obvious ones of course), how they pull of a certain stunt. It's more like The Making Of... to me, and I for one can't get enough of those... so... yes, I will download and watch it, as a filmmaking student.
Highest Grossing Film for 2008 = The Dark Knight.