-
Website
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/ -
Original page
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/video-watch-the-first-5-minutes-of-the-golden-compass.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mychaleg
85 comments · 2 points
-
Peter Donohue
123 comments · 83 points
-
littlemovieman
58 comments · 2 points
-
Rohith
48 comments · 1 points
-
Reebee7
114 comments · 58 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Twilight Saga: New Moon Sets Records, Hauls in $140 million
6 hours ago · 5 comments
-
Caption This: Win Uwe Boll’s Far Cry on DVD!
1 day ago · 20 comments
-
New Moon Topples The Dark Knight’s Opening Day Record
1 day ago · 16 comments
-
Here’s Your Chance: What Did You Think of Twilight: New Moon?
2 days ago · 23 comments
-
Remember Me Trailer: Maybe Robert Pattinson Can Act
3 days ago · 16 comments
-
Twilight Saga: New Moon Sets Records, Hauls in $140 million
Wearing Armor.
Who Fight.
I'll still go and see it. :)
One last grip. Does Lord Asriel really have an American accent? Also I imagined him as more of a skinny/bony guy (maybe Alan Rickman or something...) not with chubby cheeks and a likeable look about him... he needs to be frightening and commanding! (although I could be wrong, Daniel Craig was pretty tough as Bond).
Ahh I guess that's what I get for being a Golden Compass fangirl. I'm sort of upset about the absence of a lot of the church-stuff. I was 8 when the first book came out and eagerly read each of them on their release, rereading them through the 3rd's release. I didn't reread them again until this summer and was quite frankly floored (and impressed... and my thoughts were quite provoked) at the tons of religious blasphemy throughout. I think that makes the story engaging for both children and adults. As a kid I really just wanted to be Lyra... I never gave any thought to the broader text of Pullman's work.
@ Naomi:
I always imagined Lord Asriel to be like Terence Stamp; commanding, educated, mean-tempered with a chance to be a father figure. Or Alan Rickman, but he's a bit typecast for this film, what with the Potter franchise.
#8 - God forbid that Christian movie-goers get hooked on this series and end up reading Pullman's books.
#7 - This movie looks like it might be good, but I'll be interested to see if the themes of the book are preserved. Remember, Peter Jackson's LoTR ommitted a lot of stuff, and changed some story elements, but overall, everyone still praises it as a faithful adaptation, and a great trilogy of films.
Hopefully we'll see the same with this movie.
cheers and wish the best.
I am a friend of one who must see all of these movies in order to give family value to them, for those who want their children to know only truth, and he states, unequivically that this movie is a means of changing minds of those who are innocent and can be swayed into wondering if God really does exist, or is there another way. Harry Potter movies were blatent about their Demonic Witchcraft and tried to make Witchcraft out to be between "good" and "bad" witches and, even after those movies were watched by so many youth, the interest in Witchcraft soared and many Christian children, who saw them, began to doubt their own faith in God.
This is even more devious, for it works on the premise that there are other valid ways to live in this world, totally without being encumbered by God and his "rules" or Truth.
What most do not realize is that Demonic forces really do seek to create means to counter God and overrule any faith in Him and take allegience to themselves, by courting people with lies of self-rule, self aggrandizment, self-awareness, self-gods.
It is true that this writer is a Godless athiest and that he has used his writings to not only make fun of God, but try to get societies children to feel that they, alone, are their own gods and can choose their Demeons to lead and direct themselves. There is a sad ending to that!
seriously/ these books were amazing...
in my opinion, Philip Pullman made a fantasy novel from the workings of quantum physics, which entertain easily the possibility of parallel worlds and extra dimensions naked to us due to our limited senses as 3 dimensional creatures...
im all for being Godless. this book series had many valid points and not only challenges religion but challenges our very concept of reality, something science does every day. i love these books...my favorite series since I first picked them up when i was 13. I'm 23 now and they are still my favorite.
This is not Demonistic...you people obviously have no idea what Demonisim is and just fear the fact that being open minded will result from these movies. i think thats fantastic. being close minded never got us anywhere...we would not have any of the luxuries we have today with close mindedness.
but of course the religious fanatics are gonna go apeshit over this movie series because knowledge to the church is evil. i mean fuck the first book of the bible literally teaches that. "wanna know stuff? don't. ITS THE DEVIL" what propaghanda!!
This is also the main theme of these books..that the church doesn't want the world to know the truth..
and Lyra doesn't kill God. Interestingly enough "god" is simply the first angel which are simply creatures that can pass through parallel worlds without gates as they have less flesh. "God" took it upon himself to claim he created all things when really all things were created by themselves "matter begets matter". The best part is God turns out to just be this super super old angel that they keep in a casket because he can;t even talk anymore. he ends up dying by disintegrating during the final war when the other angels are trying to transfer him elsewhere. he's basically a figurehead even to the angels.
Just got home from the theater... Im warning you if you havent yet seen the movie, in my opinion it outright sucked. I was particularily upset by the watered down version of the strongest side characters story (if u see the movie u will know) also the ending... wow the ending biggest let down EVERRRRR!!!! I rest my case on that because when the screen went blank half the theater said "WHAT THE *@!#"
the end.
As a writer, I have trouble with "faithful adaptations" of books. I think there are fine movies created from books but I have rarely seen movies which capture the essence of a writer's style. A screenwriter once told me that a screenplay was like writing a poem, with all the other bits left out. I see the point.
A movie has its merits, often stronger than the book on which it was based. However, rarely do screen adaptations live up to their hype. If you can enjoy a movie for its strengths, fine. Same with books. But they aren't the same. A writer's style is just that. A screenwriter, even if the author of the original book, will often admit that the adaptation leaves gaps and is lacking in some ways.
Still, the graphic images and ability to bring a book "to life" is compelling to those who relate to visual images more than text.
Love them. Especially the Amber Spyglass :D. But it doesn't make you want to stop
beliving in God. If you are religious it test your faith and strengthen it.
I think that in the books the people put there faith in someone else, not the real God
thats why they said he was evil. In these universes God didn't show himself and want to
be worshiped.
Btw haven't seen the film. Is it worth watching?
Love the books :D