DISQUS

Film School Rejects: V Review: Pilot

  • Matt · 3 weeks ago
    V was not a fantastic show, but this review is basically just fanboy whining without any listing of the films merits nor its true flaws, instead opting to just go on and on and on about American television and how terrible it is. Please, actually review things in the future and don't come out acting like some whiny little troll on IMDb.

    In response to another poster:

    "and so is the parallel to Obama's administration"

    Totally agreed. This might as well air on Faux News Network considering the propaganda like nature of it. Whereas the original was about giving hope to people who were fighting a villain everyone *knew* to hate, this seems to be about painting a Hitler mustache on Obama and giving the lunatic right-wing something to laugh about while they polish their guns in preparation for assassination in the name of "resistance". I laughed out loud when Universal Health Care was revealed to be the big evil "it sounds good but it's really evil" plot. Just idiotic.
  • RobertFure · 2 weeks ago
    Did you watch the original mini-series? V is about propaganda. The dangers of it. The original channeled a lot of Nazi imagery - which is now out dated. So the relaunch has 2 groups it could villanize here - terrorists, which would make no sense, or the government. Obama is President now, so he gets the target.

    Plus, Universal Health Care, from a plot point, would make sense for aliens to want to do. It gives them carte blanch to just pick people and do all sorts of experiments.
  • Lindsay · 3 weeks ago
    Whilst I will agree generally with brians review, I think that some of the things he is annoyed about with this pilot really arent a problem of writing, but more a lack of quality Direction
    for instance the screenshot of the “significant increase.” its not like the script writers generally have any control over the visual aspects of the show.

    The most annoying thing about this pilot is the ridiculous pace with which it moves.
    the amount of themes and story arc's that were quickly hashed over in the pilot makes me wonder who the hell is at the wheel of this thing. It should have been spread across 2-3 episodes.
    in the space of 45 minutes, They try to:
    1: cover the invasion
    2: introduce all the characters, human and visitor, set some backstory and bring them together from their seperate worlds.
    3: cover the themes and social issues raised by the arrival of the visitors,
    4: explain their motives and set up a storyline for the ongoing underground resistance.
    5: build suspense for the mini cliffhang.

    45 minutes! thats just ridiculous.
    no wonder you dont care about the charachters each one has only had roughly 5 minutes of time on screen!
    I think that their desire to pack too much into a short amount of time has ruined the whole thing.
  • mychaleg · 2 weeks ago
    true dat. they wanted to get straight into it since they couldn't afford to build story on a major network for fear of losing viewers. the Fox character didn't think very quickly on his feet before that interview. when Anna threatened to cancel the interview for fear of being put in a negative light, he should have immediately told her cancelling at the last second WOULD put her in a negative light 10x more! television journalists are pretty dumb in real life, though, so i guess it's well-written.
  • Honestzed · 2 weeks ago
    Although I completely agree that they tried to cover so much in so little time, they did nothing in that little time to make any one scene or any one character, to shine. This to me is the job of the writers. The dialog was lacking and unintelligent. I think the scene that really made the show tank for me is when the reporter chastised the other reporters in front of Anna, and then his first comment to the first alien he has ever met was, "Why are you all so attractive?" Really? The first question that comes to an accomplished journalist is that? And that sad excuse at "charm" is the reason he is invited to be the V "voice". Perhaps Anna sense that only a total moron would ask such a question, so surely he would be easier to manipulate?

    As for the episode itself, it felt like it was written by a bunch of burnt out sit-com writers with nothing new to contribute other than to create the same basic one-dimensional characters they would create for a sit-com. Lacking further creativity, they then loosely base the characters on the original. I'm really not thrilled about the casting for this either. There are really no interesting actors that stand out in this -- except for the 2 ex-Firefly actors.

    These new Visitors are so advanced in technology, I can't beleive that they can solve their own problems. In the original V, it appeared that they only really mastered the control of gravity which they used for their propulsion systems. Their energy discharge weapons were fairly inferior to a machine gun loaded with armor piercing bullets. In this new V, they do mention that they have mastered control over gravity... but then they show the transport ships being maneuvered with thrusters. (Yes I am being picky now, but its like they never sat down to decide what their technology can and can't do -- a fatal flaw for any science fiction show!)

    I liked the original, and I was expecting something completely different. The original worked back in it's time, but you can't apply the same formula to a sci-fi drama made today. They didn't really deliver anything different and are trying to use the same formula. The writing/direction/production was poor. (I am tempted to say horrible, but it wasn't that aweful -- but close).
  • Kangaroo Be Stoned · 3 weeks ago
    The cliches are annoying as shit and so is the parallel to Obama's administration: tagging buildings "V" gives "hope", "devotion" is the weapon used by the Vs, and universal health care. Then "V" starts with right wing conspiracy crap; the Vs being united, no separate states (New World Order). The likes of Glenn Beck would love this show and you can bet your ass that the dumbshit reptilian conspiracy theorists will flock to it as well.

    Despite those problems, the show is utterly hilarious and I will continue to watch it.
  • Aleric · 3 weeks ago
    Seems it hits a little too close to some nerves there Kanga.

    Universal Truths weigh out. Oppresion with a smile is still oppresion.
  • RobertFure · 2 weeks ago
    Of course Reptilian conspiracy theorists will love it - that's what the movie is about. It's like saying New York Yankees fans will enjoy seeing 61*
  • Kangaroo Be Stoned · 2 weeks ago
    I had read nothing specific about this show before watching it. I was only told that it was about aliens visiting Earth. I thought "This could be interesting," so I decided to tune in. And I do not keep up with baseball so I have no idea what you are talking about. :)
  • RobertFure · 2 weeks ago
    Well you should tune in for Game 6 of the World Series tonight - as long as you root for Philadelphia!

    As for the show, I thought most people were familiar with V from the mini-series, but I guess it is a bit aged.
  • Barfbag · 3 weeks ago
    Where are all the scientists?

    Go watch the original miniseries, and count how many times that word was used. Count it now. The disparity is chilling.
  • Mark · 3 weeks ago
    I know it's science fiction and we should suspend logic at some point but we are supposed to accept that the V's have been here for many years AND exist with a reptilian body under human skin. I suppose we should accept that autopsy's do not exist.
  • Aleric · 3 weeks ago
    They are an advanced race that has the ability to travel across the universe and you think they couldn't monitor and track if one of their numbers is ever killed? Men in Black come to mind?
  • mychaleg · 2 weeks ago
    it was a sleeper cell they were hibernating DUH
  • Smarter Than The Average Bear · 3 weeks ago
    How does this show think we're dumb? How about when the news reporter states that "three weeks have passed", followed, not five seconds later, by the on-screen title "Three Weeks Later". Just in case we didn't get it.
  • Mark · 2 weeks ago
    Independence Day's multiple giant mothership alien arrival scenes were themselves a blatant rip-off of Arthur C. Clarke's great novel "Childhood's End".
  • Shiromi Arserio · 2 weeks ago
    I tend to agree with this review. I did feel very talked down to... Everything was so rushed. Nothing was allowed to be built up, including, apparently the suspense. I thought that in the first scene when she's asleep with her badge wide open so they can tell us that she's FBI... and then later when the guy in the wheelchair, returns in the wheelchair, only to stand up. In real life he would've walked in there, not dragged his wheel chair up there just only to stand up. The ending was interesting but still poorly done. Alan Tudyk was wasted. He's a visitor agent, why would he just run in and blow his cover? For that matter, why wouldn't the superior alien race just send in some kind of chemical that would kills the humans in the resistance? It just didn't feel very well thought out.
    http://www.igp-scifi.com/V-pilot-review.html
  • Ian · 2 weeks ago
    "For example the opening arrival scene, which completely rips off Independence Day..."

    Uhmm, how is possible for a show to rip off something that was originated in the original series? ID4 ripped off the original V miniseries and was even joked about last night.

    But yes, the dialogue was atrocious and they rushed through what should have been done in 3 episodes in 45 min.
  • Eydie · 2 weeks ago
    Totally agree with you. (Though I'm less optimistic than you about a turnaround, despite some interesting characters.) First off, the aliens telling *France* they’re getting universal health care is supposed to make a splash?! Second, the facism allegory should have been revisited since it’s more relevant than ever, instead of resorting to “terrorism”–recall that the two original miniseries could have gone with the too-easy “Commie” bogeyman that haunted the 1980s, but didn’t. See what else I have to say: http://www.imperfectwomen.com/v-for-vacuous/