DISQUS

Film School Rejects: Speed Racer Crashes and Burns

  • Microbefox · 1 year ago
    The film looks great in DLP. I saw it opening night with about 30+ people in the theatre in downtown Toronto. The theatre set up an area for people to line up for Speed Racer, but there was no one in them before and after the movie.

    I remember every time Speed Racer previewed at every movie I saw this year, the audience scoffed several times. People went as far as saying, "Remind me not to watch this."

    Spoilers:
    '
    '
    '
    '
    I really thought the movie was abysmal. It seemed like a mix of Speed Racer, Wacky Races and Need For Speed Underground. The backdrops seemed to be forced to be complimented with the live actors instead of the other way around. The dynamic acting really ruined the scene cuts with Spritle and the chimp. Spritle's acting was on a weird and massive-over-acting high and really took me out of the movie. The only thing I found great from the movie was the editing. I liked how the beginning switched back and fourth between present and past making sure the back story didn't drone on. The use of actors heads and cars for swipes really made the visuals flow well.

    On a technical stand point A+
    Story wise: no grade
  • Daniela · 1 year ago
    Hah! And they were trying to sell twilight fans the idea the trailer could only be seen on this movie...Thank God Lexicon cleared up the rumors or i had gone to the theaters and watch it.. just for Twilight.. the movie just looked so fake to me.. i saw some footage and it seemed like it had been all shot using the green screen.. for me.. pretty lame.
  • Robert Fure · 1 year ago
    I AM IRON MAN. And I'm so money I shit cash.
  • Kevin Gustafson · 1 year ago
    Not considering the quality of the film which I haven't seen yet, there's a bunch of reasons. Bad timing. No way Speed Racer was more popular than Iron Man. It'll take more than the Wachowski's name on it.

    Bad marketing, I'm serious. The intent I got from the trailers was that this was a cartoon with live actors. Not the way that comic adaptations have gone where they try to go for a realistic look/plot. It should have appealed more to the anime aspects than a general audience action film. A blown chance to get the otaku away from their VHS tape marathons. Let me guess when Akira comes out it will debut the same weekend as The Avengers. Smart. Very Smart.

    My other reasons also extend to every other release this month except Sex and the City which is like Iron Woman. Is it me or is Hollywood overreacting to the whole "recession" "gas crisis" fears and releasing their big guns all at once? School is still in session and I think May only has room for 2 major releases not 4 or 5. These big budget films are going to make less money I predict than if they wait until school lets out.

    I don't think GTA is a factor seeing how well Iron Man did. May is all Iron Man. Speed Racer couldn't have beat that colossus.
  • Robert Fure · 1 year ago
    The Wachowski "Brothers" is something that turns me away these days.
  • Kevin Gustafson · 1 year ago
    They made Natalie Portman shave her head. I totally agree with you there.
  • 790 · 1 year ago
    Speed Racer kicked Ass I don't know what film you guys were watching. This was a masterpiece.!!!
  • Ryan · 1 year ago
    The feed has switched from being a full text feed to just teaser. Is this a permanent thing?
  • Neil Miller · 1 year ago
    @Ryan

    Not sure why you are getting that. It should still be full text...
  • Senseless Babble · 1 year ago
    I watched it, I enjoyed it, but I wasnt blown away as i was expecting to be. All the hype said that this was going to be visually revolutionary, and unlike anything we had seen before But you know what, it wasn't. It was cool to look at, but it didnt knock my socks off. I enjoyed the film, but will admit it wasnt great. BUT, i took my kids, the group this film was marketed towards, and they wanted to leave early. They said it was boring. Only the ralley race sequence really kept their interest. The other races were too hard to follow and there was "too much talking for a race movie", or so said my son!
  • Rob Hunter · 1 year ago
    @Kevin,
    Natalie Portman is just as beautiful bald as she is haired, or un-bald, or with-hair... In fact she was doubly fine in 'V' because I was reminded of my long ago love for Sinead O'Connor.
  • jack2jack · 1 year ago
    I'm sorry you can't turn every child hood comic book or tv show into a movie. Some things should be left well enough alone. If it's not done with an adult flair to appeal to the audeince who can relate to it it should not be done at all. I hated speed racer growing up. Being the youngest and a girl I was forced to watch. I loved Johnny Socko, Godzilla, The Goul, Rod Sterling. All that scarry stuff and the pre-anemie stuff. I also prefer Tim Burton's Batman, sorry guys. Robert Downey has the balls to pull off Tony Stark. I don't see how they thought Speed Racer would translate into a movie. The special effects was to glitzy to me. Where is Neo when you need him!!!!
  • Tony · 1 year ago
    One thing that I haven't seen mentioned in write-up about this film is the idea that a different type of 'Speed Racer' film COULD have fared far better. Now, I grew up with this cartoon in perpetual reruns during my childhood. When a group of my friends heard that there would be a 'Speed racer' film, we all had a great laugh over it. We reminisced about how bad it generally was (the animation, the choppy voice edits), but we also ALL remembered the characters' names . We all remembered the oblique sense of morality the show always had (or tried to have).

    I then saw the preview with a few friends who are my age - just over 40. We all started laughing again ... but this time following our laughter with lines like "Wow, remind me to miss THIS piece of junk!". My exact comment was "Well, if I want to go to the movies to throw up I'll be first in line for this". The problem; it looked like it was more of a VIDEO GAME than a movie. People my age ... the age of many kids' parents ... don't all play video games.

    I would have loved a cute, fun 'parody' of this weird little show. I would have appreciated a 'cartoonish' element to it. But this looked to be 90+minutes of major, headache-inducing, severe sensory over-stimulation. No thanks.

    After watching the trailer a second time, I asked my girlfriend if she thought even kids wanted this type of stimulation. Her answer to me was "You see kids every day ... what do you think?" As a media librarian in a large suburban area, I see what videos kids take out of the library every day. The answer to the question then, with regards to whether they would want to see this type of visual gimmickry in a movie as opposed to a videogame was, in my mind, a resounding "No".

    A week after the movie came out, I polled the few kids who had seen it. Yep ... I was right. Even they thought it was overstimulating. Nice try, guys. Next time, let Mike Myers do it. He probably would have brought the film in for over 100k less, too.
  • 790 · 1 year ago
    I loved it.
    Totally got what the Whachowsskis were doing.
    I'm 40, and loved the cartoon.

    I think this film was ahead of it time.....
    Can't wait for the dvd.