-
Website
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/ -
Original page
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/does-the-plot-to-eagle-eye-make-any-sense.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mychaleg
85 comments · 2 points
-
Peter Donohue
123 comments · 83 points
-
littlemovieman
58 comments · 2 points
-
Rohith
48 comments · 1 points
-
Reebee7
114 comments · 66 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Boiling Point: Twilight
1 day ago · 19 comments
-
6 Actors That Should Probably Not Watch Their Own Movies
18 hours ago · 10 comments
-
Twilight Fans Get a Much-Needed Intervention
1 day ago · 9 comments
-
Caption This: Win Uwe Boll’s Far Cry on DVD!
3 days ago · 27 comments
-
New Moon Topples The Dark Knight’s Opening Day Record
3 days ago · 18 comments
-
Boiling Point: Twilight
scenes unintelligable the thing that really really really really pissed me off was the fact
that they go through the most ridiculous androundabout way of deleting files, and
removing harddrives from eagle eye when the only thing that they needed to do was
stab it in its eye like thing with a piece of metal. What the fuck? Honestly a computer
that smart should have seen that coming. I started laughing because when she picked
up the rod and went to stab it I just couldn't believe that that would stop it. Why
didn't jerrys twin just shoot the damn thing? And I felt that the self aware computer
ripped off terminator and its design was extremely similar to the computer in 2001 a
space odyssey. And a computer that sophisticated should have some kind of back up
device that's not in space to transmit files to the satellite. Anyway I found the shaking
camera really disconnected me from the action and the easewith which themachine
was stopped utterly ridiculous. And how is jerry alive and only has a sling on? He was
shot 4 times from a pretty close range and was on the floor bleeding like crazy. Too
ridiculous and serious to be enjoyable. And it took place in 2009. That popped up on
the security cams
Well I didn't give much thought to it, but since you raise the question:
Perhaps they had several stops before they arrived in washington. You know let the children have fun, before exploiting them by presenting them in washington.
2. Why didn’t Rachel just go to the cops?
Plot went like this:
Rachel gets phonecall, sees her kid in that TV, and gets into the car. She does so, since she didn't know what else to do, and hoped by complying, they would leave her kid alone. Afterwards it explodes pretty much in a series of events, where she has barely time ti breathe, and almost no opportunity to go to the cops.
The question is, would you ignore the voice, which seems to be able to track every step you take, and possibly endanger your kid?
3. Do people actually think a computer can kill you remotely?
Ok I also didn't get the hardwire lines kill.
4. Why would a computer choose the most convoluted way possible to kill people?
Well since the terrorists were upset about the funeral bombing, I guess some random accidents that kill some hogher officials wouldn't satisfy them.
But an act of terrorism may soothen their thirst for revenge.
5. Were we in the future or something?
Somewhat .... dunno, who cares? maybe it was a timeline where nazi dinosaurs rule Europe, but it's not that important.
Someof your small questions are neglectable, some are not really substantial (what if edward norton hadn't been shiszo in "fihgt club"? Well there would be barely a plot")
What killed the movie for me was the protagonist. Average jack turns into hero. Yeah it' ok, but I dodn't like the protagonist.
about 17 and half hours from chicago to dc btw