DISQUS

Film School Rejects: Discuss: How Do You Feel About Blade Runner 2?

  • Davebaxter1989 · 1 year ago
    ummm...no.
  • Nevernude · 1 year ago
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

    NO NO NO NO! DON'T PISS ME OFF MOTHERF**KERS! LEAVE BLADERUNNER ALONE! REMAKE EVERY MOVIE EVER MADE, DO A SEQUEL FOR EVERY MOVIE TO EVER FEATURE IN A TOP 10 LIST...CITIZEN KANE, THE GODFATHER, WIND IN THE WILLOWS..I DONT AND WONT EVER GIVE A S**T ABOUT THEM BUT YOU TOUCH BLADERUNNER AND YOU WILL HAVE TO ANSWER TO ME!

    noooo *sob sob* say it aint so hollywood....
  • T · 1 year ago
    You can just picture how shit it would be- Josh Hartnett or some other new Hollywood goon reprising the Deckard role - SHUDDER!

    You don't get people painting the Mona Lisa 2 - BLADE RUNNER is a masterpiece too - LEAVE IT ALONE!!!


    T
  • Nish · 1 year ago
    I could see a film set in the Blade Runner universe. A friend of Phillip K Dick has written several sequel books to resolve the differences between the film and Do Andriods Dream of Electric Sheep and any film adaptation of these books could be quite good. I think as long as Ridley Scott himself handled it and made it according to his vision, not the second-tier writers of Eagle Eye, then it could work, escpecially as the themes in the original film, globalisation, overpopulation, genetic engineering are still relavent today.
  • scott · 1 year ago
    I don't think that there is enough information yet. If Ridley Scott has total creative control over the project, and the script is good, then yeah; a Bladerunner sequel could be awesome. I some how doubt that will happen though.
  • HempKnight757 · 1 year ago
    How about a stand-alone movie & no more sequel/remake garbage?
    Like for real what happen to originally because it seems to be dead in Hollywood.
    So if wanna go see something original go see Saw V. It won't be the same basic movie at all, I swear (not really).
  • Rob Hunter · 1 year ago
    mmmm to the "scantily clad pictures of Grace Park"... but what's Blade Runner?
  • Mister Hand · 1 year ago
    BLADE RUNNER is my favorite movie of all time, and I would rank it as the second greatest science fiction film ever made, right behind 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY. Having said that, I think this is the last movie on the face of the Earth that needs a sequel. But if they do make a sequel, I think the Shia Lebouf idea is AWESOME. Because when I'm wondering who's Harrison Ford's equal in the current crop of Hollywood actors, the first name that comes to mind is Shia. 'Cause he's just all sorts of awesome. And manly. He doesn't come off as a snotty little kid at all. He commands the screen with his permanently-affixed expression of bewilderment.

    Anyway, I don't think this is worth raising a fuss over. I'd be shocked if it ever got off the ground.
  • big K · 1 year ago
    A "Blade Runner" sequel? Sure, why not? While we're at it why don't we get started on the sequel to "Citizen Kane: Rosebud's Tale" or how about "To Kill A Mockingbird 2: The Revenge of Atticus"?

    Some times it's cool to leave the past in the past, man.
  • goldwriting · 1 year ago
    Yet another movie that has no need of a remake. On top of that, could we please find jobs for these two writers that involves an original idea (Eagle Eye doesn't count since it is in my mind an unofficial and illogical remake of WarGames)? Remaking Clash of the Titans could be fun because of the enhanced effects we have today, but half of the charm came from those stop motion animations. As for their new take on The Warriors, campy movies from the 70's should stay in the 70's.

    P.S. To Big K: I would totally buy a DVD of "The Revenge of Atticus". Do you think they could get Jason Statham?
  • TL · 1 year ago
    Considering the critical pounding Eagle Eye has recieved, I doubt these guys will ever get a shot at writing a Blade Runner 2.

    It does sound like "wishful thinking" on their part.

    Besides, if they ever geenlight a Blade Runner sequel, we'd have to read countless stories about crazy ass Sean Young demanding to be in the move.

    Nobody needs that.
  • Cole Abaius · 1 year ago
    How do I feel about Blade Runner 2? Great. How do I feel about the guys from Eagle Eye slap-dashing their way through a convoluted "heavily-borrowed" script? Fucking awful.
  • J.L. Sosa · 1 year ago
    A sequel seems pointless. But if Brett Ratner were to direct a Platinum Dunes remake of "Blade Runner," starring Paris Hilton as Pris, I would be all over it. That would fucking rock.
  • Ronnie · 1 year ago
    From what I hear, Blade Runner wasn't a pleasant experience for both Ford and Scott, so I doubt they will be back in.
  • ddog · 1 year ago
    SACRILEGE!
  • Aleric · 1 year ago
    I would have to see a storyline on the movie to even give my opinion. There is not need for a sequal, but another movie in the same universe is possible.
  • D Train · 1 year ago
    “I have a lot of respect for it and can’t even fathom a sequel or anything even set in the same universe.”
    Trivia Drop: you guys remember the steaming pile of garbage that was Soldier starring Kurt Russell? Yep. Same universe. Seriously. Look it up.
  • Sam · 1 year ago
    Oh man, this is terrible news
    like, horrible.

    Actually I take that back, I haven't seen Eagle Eye, but from what all I have read, it's terrible. Ignoring that for a second, it took two decades to get the version Ridley Scott wanted out (which I will agree with everyone and say is the best version). Now, I enjoy Scott as a director, and so forth, and respect him for what he's done (you know, here and there). He's had a long career and blah blah blah, I don't think this Eagle Eye guy is up to snuff.

    The other part of this for me, is that sci fi in the 80s was so bleak. The stories were bleak, the sets were bleak, the colours were bleak, etc. Scifi now is not, or at least, most of it is not. You get these shiny, looked at how amazing my computer is movies, and they don't have the same dystopia feeling that movies like Alien, Bladerunner, etc, had in the 80s. That, I think, is my biggest issue. The 'feel' of the movie would be wrong, and I wouldn't be able to get into it, or enjoy it, even if it was well written. Much like the Star Wars prequels (I'm not saying they were well written, just shiny and so far from the original three), I think even if this turns out to be a good movie, it won't stand up against the original, and I'll take a steaming shit on top of the dvd on a mountain while throwing a fax machine off of it. Or something.

    As for Dtrain's comment about them being in the same universe, I think you mean Bladerunner was based on a Philip K Dick story (do androids dream of electric sleep), and Soldier was sort of, kinda, referencing maybe sort of elements of several short Philip K Dick stories, then sure. Not really important though, since they're about different stories...
  • Frandy co · 1 year ago
    Once again as imagine “Eagle eye” has come up with much to gain. Lot of character been involve. Dramatically changing fast moving thriller it was. Different angles of view and ideas shared with grate deal of assurance of entertainment. Wow I saw it for many a times. Really because it was good at http://www.80millionmoviesfree.com