-
Website
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/ -
Original page
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-ews-ranking-of-the-50-greatest-active-directors.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mychaleg
110 comments · 3 points
-
Peter Donohue
155 comments · 92 points
-
littlemovieman
58 comments · 2 points
-
Rohith
63 comments · 1 points
-
Reebee7
134 comments · 85 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Boiling Point: Too Early to Talk Avatar?
1 day ago · 12 comments
-
Michael Bay’s Alternate Vision for Transformers 3
11 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Arianna Huffington Out’s The Wachowskis’ Next
10 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Culture Warrior’s Culturally Significant Films of the Decade
1 day ago · 6 comments
-
Mark Wahlberg Threatens to Make an ‘Entourage’ Movie
2 days ago · 15 comments
-
Boiling Point: Too Early to Talk Avatar?
The names on this list make sense for the most part but the order seems completely wrong...
And what about Lars Von Trier? C'mon, there's got to be a dozen art-house/cult/indie directors who are better directors than say, Judd Apatow or Mel Gibson... !
I would have put Aronofski in the Top 10 and what's Apatow doing up ahead of him.
Damn you EW !!!!
Like he said above, the orders of these things are always annoying.
Hey, as long as Kevin Smith isn't on this list I'm happy. I'm sure it's a fun guy, and is very cool, but my god.
The list was void for me after I saw that.
I'm not saying he'd be one of my picks, but compared to who else is on the list, he deserves a spot, the guy directed Braveheart and Passion of the Christ.
If the list is about active directors, then the stuff they're actively doing now should be good I reckon. I don't see M. Night Shalyman on there for The Sixth Sense.
Not that I want to start a debate over the merits of the Sixth Sense of course; it's merely an example.
I know that doesnt make much sense, but do you kinda get my point. i gues sim saying there are worse selections/rankings on this list
I know that doesnt make much sense, but do you kinda get my point. i guess im saying there are worse selections/rankings than Mel Gison on this list
"If you're going to allow THAT mediocre director to make the top 50, then why not THIS one?"
Do you honestly believe that Jon Favreau is a 'greater' than Herzog?
That's why I cry 'BS!' on this one.
The Peter Jackson thing is weird too. Don't get me wrong, the LOTR trilogy was an amazing accomplishment, but since then, a poorly received 'King Kong' remake, and nothing.
You know, it's goddamned Entertainment Weekly putting these things out just to screw with everyone. People will send this list around, bitch about EW, pick up the edition with this article, ching! They think they're so clever.
That's why I cry 'BS!' on this one.
The Peter Jackson thing is weird too. Don't get me wrong, the LOTR trilogy was an amazing accomplishment, but since then, a poorly received 'King Kong' remake, and nothing.
You know, it's goddamned Entertainment Weekly putting these things out just to screw with everyone. People will send this list around, bitch about EW, pick up the edition with this article, ching! They think they're so clever.
Though, I recommend you try Stroszek. It may wash out the bad taste that Aguirre left.
I mean, props for Soderbergh being recognized as awesome, and Cronenberg should be higher... so should Alfonso Cuaron. (yeah, he hasn't made many movies lately, but damn are they good.) Amoldóvar should also be much, MUCH higher. Lists are pretty stupid. But I like them.
Also Jon Favreau? wtf? how is he in demand?...dude has to prove himself with other stuff first
Speilberg needs to be around the middle, sorry but ET and the other schlock he produced in the 80's will always keep me from regarding him as anythng but a mass market toy commerical director. Dont even get me started on Spike Lee. Oliver Stone needs to be rolled off, but the BIGGEST disgrace on that list is the POS Michael Moore. That pile of scum doesn't deserve to even be in the same room with most of these directors.
Eastwood seriously needs to be moved up the list.
Cameron hasn't directed a feature since Titanic - over 10 years ago. He should be on the list but not top 10.
Apatow that high is a joke - his couple movies he has directed are good but I wouldn't consider him a great director. He's really made his mark as a producer.
Snyder's way too high.
JJ Abrams - I love his stuff but see the criticism of Apatow.
Shocked that Eastwood wasn't in the top-5, let alone the top-10.
The only thing that I can say in regards to Jackson is even though we haven't seen much from him he does have his hands in alot of projects. But in no way shape or form does that mean he deserves #2.
How many of these directors on this list would make your top 50? I mean Zack Snyder makes 16? Really? They should call this "The Top 50 Directors that we either remember were good, or have had hyped films either this or last year." Just a suggestion. :)
Yeah, not to sound like a film snob, but when Paul Blart is number one two weeks in a row, you know that intellect is being handed out in small doses these days.
...marry me!
"Hook", "Terminal", "Always" and "1941" are likewise junk.