-
Website
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/ -
Original page
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/aronofsky-leaves-it-all-on-the-mat-with-the-wrestler.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mychaleg
85 comments · 2 points
-
Peter Donohue
123 comments · 83 points
-
littlemovieman
58 comments · 2 points
-
Rohith
48 comments · 1 points
-
Reebee7
114 comments · 59 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Caption This: Win Uwe Boll’s Far Cry on DVD!
1 day ago · 24 comments
-
Twilight Saga: New Moon Sets Records, Hauls in $140 million
18 hours ago · 9 comments
-
New Moon Topples The Dark Knight’s Opening Day Record
1 day ago · 18 comments
-
Here’s Your Chance: What Did You Think of Twilight: New Moon?
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
Fringe Star Defends Us Against ‘UFO’
7 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Caption This: Win Uwe Boll’s Far Cry on DVD!
Damn it!!!
ArrdgggHhhhh !!
Rourke will definilty win an Oscar for this amazing performance.
curious what your other top two are
I live in SE Appalachia Ohio. We have the same problem here. If we want to see a critically acclaimed film such as The Wrestler, Slumdog, Synecdoche or other non-wide release films we're kinda SOL. The really cool thing is that the Athena Cinema in Athens has been purchased by Ohio University and will focus solely on Indie films. So that will help save a trip to Columbus, or Cleveland to watch a film.
1. The camera work is the same as on "Pi." Aronofsky has yet to show me he's learned anything from making movies.
2. There are at least 3 occasions (one of them is the scene you describe, of him taking the long walk to the deli) where the message of the film is wielded like a folding chair to the face of the audience. I mean, seriously, "Don't Know What You Got Til Its Gone" is the song that introduces us to the Ram.
3. For a 95 minute film, the pacing felt slow at times.
For me, you left out the best part - "The Wrestler" by Bruce Springsteen, which should be, at least, nominated for Best Song. All that being said, Rourke is good (though playing a character he is intimately familiar with) and the movie is really good. The reason I'm being hard on it is that it's not Best Film of the Year good, not to me. I'm firmly in the camp of disliking just about everything Aronofsky has done. (I enjoyed Requiem of a Dream) I'm not sure what should win Best Picture of the Year yet, but it's definitely not The Wrestler.
if you are not aware of Aronofsky's style then you need to go re-watch Requiem for a Dream and the fountain
but your first comment, you said he hasn't progressed as a film maker, and you are amazingly mistaken. He has signature things that he likes to do in his previous movies, the reason being he did not do those signature things (slow panning while everything moves fast, close ups of peoples eyes and pupils dialiting,) ETC the reason he didn't do it and kept to the hand held look like Pi. was simple
he would have taken away from the actors with that, and aronofsky realized he needed to step back his creativity with this movie and just let the actors shine more than the directing, though the directing is amazingly well done you are too blind by the fact you hate his work to probably realize this.
all in all i respect your opinion, but totally disagree